Borda v. Executive Office for the United States Attorney
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt.10) and Plaintiffs motion for leave to amend (Dkt.20). For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s motion is DENIED and Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, who is a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this suit under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, in 2014. His initial complaint sought to compel the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (“EOUSA”) to produce…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Borda v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Borda v. U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal DivisionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Burke v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Borda v. Executive Office for the United States AttorneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Burke v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.