Legal Opinion

Doe v. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 15, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-0701Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25 - 701 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE U.S. COURTS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jane Doe is a pro se plaintiff who filed what the Court construes as a Complaint on March 10, 2025. See Compl., ECF No. 1. On the same day, she filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See Pl.’s Mot. Leave, ECF No. 2. She has since filed several other motions, including a Motion for Preliminary Injunction and a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (TRO),…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API