Legal Opinion

United States v. Pompeo

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 4, 1955No. 4842PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

In this case the Government appeals from a decision of the United States Customs Court, one judge dissenting, which upheld importer’s claim that certain superchargers, designed for use on automobiles, were properly classifiable as parts for automobiles and dutiable at 12% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 369 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802. The involved superchargers had been classified by the collector as “machines” not specially provided for and assessed with duty at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stoeger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bauerhin Technologies Limited Partnership, and John v. Carr & Son Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Auto-Ordnance Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Brother International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
  4. Ludvig Svensson (U.S.) Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  5. Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API