Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Chief Judge:
This action is about the correct tariff classification of two items of glass merchandise that Plaintiff, The Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. (“Pomeroy” or “Plaintiff’), imported from Mexico. The United States Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) classified both items of merchandise, under Heading 7013 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), as “[g]lassware of a kind used for ... indoor decoration or similar purposes,” with a 5, 10, or 12% ad valorem duty. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly classified, under Heading 9405, as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- North American Processing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Pillowtex Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Arthur L. Franklin (Doing Business as Health Technologies Network) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Streetsurfing LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Deckers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- The Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013