Legal Opinion
Brother International Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 31, 2002No. Slip Op. 02-80; 00-01-00007PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Senior Judge.
This case is before the Court upon cross-motions for summary judgment. At issue is the proper tariff classification of a part, styled model number “PC 101,” used in certain multifunction center (“MFC”) machines and facsimile machines. The plaintiff importer, Brother International Corp. (“Brother”), which manufactures the MFC and facsimile machines that use the PC 101, claims that the subject merchandise should be classified under subheading 8473.80.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) (1998), and may be entered duty free. The United…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Cummins Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Faus Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- BASF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Deckers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.