Legal Opinion
Bauerhin Technologies Limited Partnership, and John v. Carr & Son Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 2, 1997No. 96-1275, 96-1276PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Bauerhin Technologies Limited Partnership and John V. Carr & Son Inc. (collectively, Bauerhin) appeal from the summary judgment of the United States Court of International Trade holding that the United States Customs Service correctly classified their imported child seat inserts. Bauerhin Techs. Ltd. v. United States, 914 F.Supp. 554 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1995). The United States cross-appeals from the court’s holding that Customs incorrectly classified certain canopies as parts of car seats. Because the court did not err in determining the proper classification for either…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- E.M. Chemicals v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Guess? Incorporated v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Marcel Watch Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Willoughby Camera Stores, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Baxter Healthcare Corporation of Puerto Rico v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Park B. Smith, Ltd., Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Rollerblade, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Primal Lite, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Forest Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.