Auto-Ordnance Corp. v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Auto-Ordnance Corp., a manufacturer of. semi-automatic carbines, sued to recover excise taxes assessed pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 4181 on the “added value” of adjustable rear sights and front sight and compensator units sold with certain carbines that it manufactured. Auto-Ordnance appeals from an order of the United States Claims Court, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed its complaint.
The questions presented on this appeal are whether the Claims Court erred in finding that the adjustable rear sights and front sight and compensator…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- White v. AronsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Nomura (America) Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Nomura (America) Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- United States v. Willoughby Camera Stores, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- United States v. PompeoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Xerox Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Exxon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- David W. Shenk & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Coca-Cola Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.