Legal Opinion
Withers v. Moore
California Supreme Court
Decided October 13, 1903No. S.F. No. 2541PublishedCited by 22 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. .
The case involves a contract for the sale of two cargoes of coal by the plaintiff to the defendant. The plaintiff was a merchant doing business in London, England, and the defendant was engaged in the coal business in San Francisco. The contract was made by cable. The defendant in the course of his business as a coal-shipper had adopted a certain form of charter-party for the shipment of coal upon vessels. In June, 1893, he had written a letter to the plaintiff upon the subject of buying coal of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burns v. Sennett & MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Fountain v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Ah Tong v. Earle Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Holloway v. McNearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Insurance Co. v. Palatine Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Sanguinetti v. RossenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Paez v. Mutual Indemnity Accident, Health & Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Sharpe v. Arabian American Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Nesbitt Fruit Products, Inc. v. Del Monte Beverage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.