Sanguinetti v. Rossen
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. E. N. Rector, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
Action to recover possession of a small parcel of land in San Joaquin county, described as being in sections 4 and 5, in township 1 north, range 8 east, M. D. M. The averments of ownership and right of possession in the complaint are denied in the answer, which also «contains affirmative allegations of ownership in Alta Dur ham and Mrs. Louise Place, who were made parties defendant by order of the court. The general averment of title in these defendants, under whom the other defendants claim the right to remain in possession of the premises, is followed by voluminous allegations detailing the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Kirby v. TallmadgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Pell v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Hayne v. HermannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Kimball v. TrippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Barbara A. v. John G.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Eisenberg v. GoldsmithMontana Supreme Court · 1911
- Weinstein v. MoersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.