Legal Opinion
Paez v. Mutual Indemnity Accident, Health & Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 17, 1931No. Docket No. 900PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, J., pro tem.
The defendant appeals from a judgment on one of its policies. On June 12, 1926, one Joseph R. Paez applied for a policy of health and accident insurance of the defendant company. At the time the application was made he paid to the agent of the company #3, to be applied on the first premium, and on his death held a receipt issued by the agent therefor. On July 4, 1926, the said Joseph R. Paez was killed, the policy never having been actually delivered into the possession of the insured. The plaintiff was the beneficiary under said policy. The defendant denies liability in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Harrigan v. Home Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Millard v. Supreme Council of American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Carr v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Miller v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. California Cotton Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Culley v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Blue Shield of California Life & Health Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.