Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Mechanics' Insurance Co. v. Palatine Insurance Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1900No. S.F. No. 1414PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

' GAROUTTE, J.

This action is based upon a policy of reinsurance. Plaintiff, having issued a policy of insurance for one year upon certain personal property, made application to defendant for reinsurance. This application asked defendant to issue it a policy of reinsurance covering the period from June 19, 1894, to June 19, 1895, and the application was granted and the policy issued. The property was destroyed by fire June 20, 1895. Plaintiff now contends that the policy of reinsurance issued by defendant covered the risk, inasmuch as its (plaintiff’s) policy upon the property covered the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tesson v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gillis v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. The Continental Insurance Company of New York, New York, a Corporation v. Richard B. CottenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. Withers v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Leonhart v. California Wine Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API