Legal Opinion
Nesbitt Fruit Products, Inc. v. Del Monte Beverage Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1960No. Civ. 18511PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment re straining them from using bottles, labels, etc., bearing the trademarks “Nesbitt’s of California” or “Nesbitt” or ‘‘Sprig,’’ and from bottling, selling or distributing beverages manufactured under authority from plaintiffs.
Questions Presented
1. The validity and effect of an agreement of compromise.
2. Sufficiency of findings.
3. Admission of business records.
Record
Upon the theory that franchises granted defendants by plaintiffs had terminated, plaintiffs, manufacturers of bottling concentrates, brought this action to permanently enjoin defendants from using…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Milton v. Hudson Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Miller v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Prop. Cal. SCJLW One Corp. v. Leamy, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Louisville Title Insurance v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Freeman v. TraylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.