Legal Opinion

State v. Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1979No. 50PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. COPELAND, Justice.

For the reasons stated below, we must grant the defendant a new trial on his burglary conviction, and we find no error in the remaining convictions. .

In his first assignment of error, the defendant contends the trial court erred in not submitting to the jury the lesser included offense of second degree burglary as an alternative to a verdict of first degree burglary. We agree; therefore, the defendant must be granted a new trial on his conviction of first degree burglary.

In State v. Tippett, 270 N.C. 588, 155 S.E. 2d 269 (1967), Mr. and Mrs. Patton had been entertaining…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. TippettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. PartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. SilvaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. CorbettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API