State v. Bracey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
The first issue we must address is whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding the three separate charges were erroneously consolidated for trial. The Court of Appeals interpreted State v. Greene, 294 N.C. 418, 241 S.E. 2d 662 (1978), a case wherein a charge of assault with intent to commit rape was held to have been properly consolidated with charges of kidnapping and rape which occurred three hours later, to require this result. The Court of Appeals reasoned:
The rationale of that case was that two separate charges may be consolidated if the scheme or plan is to accomplish…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- State v. SyrianiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. ReeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.