Legal Opinion

State v. Parton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1981No. 81PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant argues eleven assignments of error on appeal. We have carefully considered each assignment and conclude that the trial court committed no error which would entitle defendant to a new trial.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to participate as co-counsel at his trial, in violation of his constitutional right to represent himself. It has been established that the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made applicable to the states by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, guarantees the accused in…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API