Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1981No. 108PublishedCited by 166 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

This appeal presents sixty-two assignments of error for our review. No meaningful summary statement of these numerous assignments is possible. Each of the assignments susceptible of merit is treated separately. Our conclusion is that defendant is entitled to a new trial on the kidnapping charge. On all other charges, we find no error.

In relevant summary the facts are: On 30 August 1978, Patty Bazemore was accosted by the defendant in Woodland, North Carolina. At gunpoint, he forced her to drive with him, in her automobile, to Fayetteville, where they spent the night in the…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. John A. Spinkellink, 1 v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Offender RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by166 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. BondurantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API