Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. Doe
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
J. JONES, Justice.
Jane Doe appeals the magistrate court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to her two children. We affirm.
I
Factual and Procedural Background
In September of 2005, the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (the Department) received information regarding possible environmental and safety concerns in Jane Doe’s home, where she lived with her husband and three children (J.S., B.S., and J.T.). At the time of the referral, Doe’s youngest child, J.S., was eleven months old, B.S. was two years old, and J.T. was seven years old. Doe’s husband is the biological father of the two…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Roe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Folks v. Moscow School District No. 281Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Re: Thermination of Parental Rights (mother)Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Elliott v. VerskaIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- In re the Termination of the Parental Rights of DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.