Legal Opinion

Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2014No. 42291PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

Jane Doe (“Mother”) appeals the Bonneville County magistrate court’s judgment that terminated her parental rights to three of her children. The magistrate court concluded that the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (“IDHW”) proved by clear and convincing evidence that Mother and John Doe (“Father”) neglected their children and that terminating parental rights was in the children’s best interests. Mother argues IDHW did not show clear and convincing evidence, the court failed to properly consider her disability, and IDHW did not make reasonable efforts to help her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Re: Thermination of Parental Rights (mother)Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Dayley v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State, Department of Health & Welfare v. CheatwoodIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare Ex Rel. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Doe (In Re Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API