Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. Doe
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Chief Justice.
Jane Doe (“Mother”) appeals the Bonneville County magistrate court’s judgment that terminated her parental rights to three of her children. The magistrate court concluded that the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (“IDHW”) proved by clear and convincing evidence that Mother and John Doe (“Father”) neglected their children and that terminating parental rights was in the children’s best interests. Mother argues IDHW did not show clear and convincing evidence, the court failed to properly consider her disability, and IDHW did not make reasonable efforts to help her…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Re: Thermination of Parental Rights (mother)Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Dayley v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- State, Department of Health & Welfare v. CheatwoodIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Idaho Department of Health & Welfare Ex Rel. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Doe (In Re Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.