Elliott v. Verska
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
This is an appeal from a partial judgment dismissing this action as to two defendants on the ground that they had not been served with process within six months of the date that the complaint was filed as required by Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 4(a)(2). We affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
Factual Background
In October 2007, Joseph M. Verska, M.D., performed two back surgeries upon Kristeen M. Elliott (Plaintiff). On November 28,2008, Plaintiff hired attorney Thomas G. Maile, IV, to handle a malpractice claim against Dr. Verska. Mr. Maile filed a request for a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Bingham v. Montane Resource AssociatesIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Sammis v. Magnetek, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brown v. GreenheartIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Vanderwal v. Albar, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Hansen v. WhiteIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Rencher/Sundown LLC v. PearsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.