Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Verska

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 2012No. 38070PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a partial judgment dismissing this action as to two defendants on the ground that they had not been served with process within six months of the date that the complaint was filed as required by Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 4(a)(2). We affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

Factual Background

In October 2007, Joseph M. Verska, M.D., performed two back surgeries upon Kristeen M. Elliott (Plaintiff). On November 28,2008, Plaintiff hired attorney Thomas G. Maile, IV, to handle a malpractice claim against Dr. Verska. Mr. Maile filed a request for a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Bingham v. Montane Resource AssociatesIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sammis v. Magnetek, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brown v. GreenheartIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Vanderwal v. Albar, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Hansen v. WhiteIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Rencher/Sundown LLC v. PearsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API