State v. Fischer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Christianson, Justice.
Action is brought by the state of Minnesota against defendants who own lands over which the state seeks to establish a flowage *3easement appurtenant to an existing dam under M. S. A. 110.31, et seq. The trial court found that defendants or their predecessors in interest had dedicated a perpetual flowage easement over the lands in question2 for all overflow and other effects of water thereon resulting from the existence, maintenance, and operation of the dam at a crest elevation of 1065.40.
Defendants own lands bordering on Harden Lake and Hoff Lake in Meeker county,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- City of St. Paul v. ColterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- Taylor v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- TePoel v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Anderson v. BirkelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Buller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Corneal v. State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Security Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. C & C Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Marsh v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.