Legal Opinion

Corneal v. State Plant Board

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 21, 1958PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

101 So.2d 371 (1958)

Harry CORNEAL and Gertrude Corneal, his wife, Appellants,

v.

STATE PLANT BOARD, a Body Corporate under the Laws of the State of Florida, and Charles Poucher, Individually and as Agent for Said Board, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 21, 1958.

Walker & Walker and Allen E. Walker, Winter Haven, for appellants.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Ralph E. Odum and John J. Blair, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellees.

ROBERTS, Justice.

This cause is before the court on the petition of Harry Corneal and wife "to review judgment refusing to assess costs on appeal against appellees".

Th…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Dade County v. BrighamSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co. v. Louisiana Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  4. Makofsky v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  5. Corneal v. State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Simpson v. MerrillSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Palethorpe v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  3. Broward County v. BouldinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. County of Brevard v. Interstate Engineering Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. City of Miami v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API