Legal Opinion
Buller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 24, 1994No. C5-93-138PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Chief Justice.
This appeal arises out of the consolidated trial of two complaints by respondents the Bullers, alleging fraud in the sale of three silos manufactured by appellant A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. (AOSHPI). This court must decide whether certain of the trial court’s findings of fact were clearly erroneous.
Donald Buller is an experienced farmer. He and his wife, Eileen, had operated a farm in Lincoln County since 1967 and raised each year approximately 100 head of cattle. He was approached in 1975 by Floyd Oldewurtel, a salesman for a local distributor, Hawke and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Schmucking v. MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Marvin Klehr and Mary Klehr William G. Olson, Intervenor v. A.O. Smith Corporation A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Michael John Hernandez v. General Mills Federal CreditCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Horn v. A.O. Smith Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Helleloid v. Independent School District No. 361District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company Marvin Windows of Tennessee, Inc. v. Ppg Industries, Inc., Third Party v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc., Third Party Minnesota, Amicus on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.