Marsh v. Carlson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal from an amended judgment entered in a declaratory judgment action to determine conflicting claims to registered lakeshore property. We affirm.
FACTS
This action involves title to shoreland property on Whitefish Lake. Both parties claim title through separate land registration proceedings brought by one A.C. Kavli and covering neighboring subdivisions. Appellants Marsh and Turner own lots in Manhattan Beach subdivision, originally platted and registered in 1927. Respondents Ulstad and Carlson have purchased what is presently a peninsula, registered in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Konantz v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Owsley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Gilbert v. EmersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Nicolin v. SchneiderhanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Knudson v. TrebeschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Claussen v. City of LauderdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004