State v. Rolph
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury charged with the crime of practicing medicine without a license, tried in the district court for Yellow Medicine county before Daly, J., who when the state rested denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. At the opening of the trial defendant objected to the introduction of any testimony on the ground that the indictment did not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense or the violation of any law of the state.
Read the full summary
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury charged with the crime of practicing medicine without a license, tried in the district court for Yellow Medicine county before Daly, J., who when the state rested denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. At the opening of the trial defendant objected to the introduction of any testimony on the ground that the indictment did not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense or the violation of any law of the state. The objection was overruled. The jury returned a verdict of guilty. From an order denying her motion for a new trial,…
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Yellow Medicine county and thereby charged with the crime of practicing medicine without a license in violation of section 4981, G. S. 1913. On a trial of the issues presented by her plea of not guilty she was convicted and thereafter appealed from an order denying a new trial.
The statute on which the prosecution is founded declares that any person who shall practice medicine in this state without first obtaining a license therefor shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished in the manner and to the extent thereby prescribed. The statute further…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Parks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Commonwealth v. ZimmermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- State v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Marshall & Brown-Sidorowicz, P.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
- Granger v. AdsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Ingebritson v. TJERNLUND MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Shenk v. State Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- State v. BohlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920