Legal Opinion
State v. Howard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 25, 1896No. Nos. 10,178-(56)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
Case certified from district court for Wright county, Smith, J.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The defendant demurred to the indictment returned against him by the grand jury of the county of Wright, and filed in the district court of such county on June 16, 1896. The court overruled the demurrer, and certified the case to this court.
*310Omitting the title, the indictment is in these words:
“John R. Howard is accused by the grand jury of the county of Wright and state of Minnesota, by this indictment, of the crime of bribery of a judicial officer committed as follows:
“On the 9th day of December, A. D. 1895, there was pending for trial in the district court in and for the county of Wright…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- State v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Groff v. RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Schmidt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Goldberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- State v. SchnellMontana Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- State v. OmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- State v. EichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.