Legal Opinion
State v. Marshall & Brown-Sidorowicz, P.A.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided April 14, 1978No. 48,877PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REES, J.:
This is an appeal by defendants from convictions for conspiracy to commit bribery as defined by K.S.A. 21-3302 and K.S.A. 21-3901. We affirm.
The prosecution of these defendants arises out of the award by the State of Kansas in March, 1972, of an architectural contract for expansion of the Kansas University Medical Center in Kansas City, Kansas. Defendant Sidorowicz is an architect and officer of the corporate defendant, Marshall and Brown-Sidorowicz.
The award of the contract was the subject of an investigation by then Attorney General Miller in the autumn of 1973. Initially, Miller’s…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Tad R. Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- George Herman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. FadelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ByrdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kwallek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. HobsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- State v. SherrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Rome v. FountainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.