Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Shenk v. State Board of Examiners
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 3, 1933No. 29,158PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 250 N.W. 353. Mandamus, petitioner appealing from an order sustaining a general demurrer to his petition and quashing the alternative writ.
Respondents constitute the state board of examiners in basic sciences, functioning under L. 1927, p. 228, c. 149, 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, §§ 5705-1 to 5705-23, establishing the board for the purpose, as stated in the title, among other things, of regulating "the practice of healing" as defined in the act. Petitioner is not within the special exceptions made by § 16. He stands on the general exception of § 8, hereinafter construed. If he is so…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Lambert v. YellowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Commonwealth v. ZimmermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- State v. GallagherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. EndSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Pettit Grain & Potato Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Ellestad v. SwayzeWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Hahn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- State ex rel. Collet v. ScopelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.