Granger v. Adson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
LORING, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining^ a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint in an action to enjoin the defendants from interfering with a contract which plaintiff had with a Dr. Grave. The complaint alleges that plaintiff, who is a layman, conducts what is termed a “health audit” in the city of Minneapolis. For a fee of ten dollars per year he contracts with his “subscribers” to furnish four urinalyses and a blood pressure test each year. The urine samples are sent in by mail as a general rule, and plaintiff then turns them over to Dr. Grave, a pathologist with whom he has…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Disbarment of George H. OtternessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- State v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- State v. RolphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Heintze v. New Jersey State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
3Cited by11 opinions
- Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. Acute Care Chiropractic Clinic P.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Spine Imaging MRI, L.L.C. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.