Legal Opinion

Granger v. Adson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 3, 1933No. 29,476PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LORING, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining^ a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint in an action to enjoin the defendants from interfering with a contract which plaintiff had with a Dr. Grave. The complaint alleges that plaintiff, who is a layman, conducts what is termed a “health audit” in the city of Minneapolis. For a fee of ten dollars per year he contracts with his “subscribers” to furnish four urinalyses and a blood pressure test each year. The urine samples are sent in by mail as a general rule, and plaintiff then turns them over to Dr. Grave, a pathologist with whom he has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Disbarment of George H. OtternessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. State v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. State v. RolphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. Heintze v. New Jersey State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. Acute Care Chiropractic Clinic P.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  5. Spine Imaging MRI, L.L.C. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API