Ingebritson v. TJERNLUND MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Two employees, both of whom sustained work-connected back injuries, were treated by duly licensed chiropractors. Their claims, under the workmen’s compensation statute, for payment of the reasonable fees incurred for chiropractic services were contested by the employers and their insurer on the sole ground that chiropractic services are not compensable under that statute.
The primary question is whether charges for any chiropractic treatment of an injured employee are compensable under the workmen’s compensation statute. Secondary questions, reached only if the answer to that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Goss v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Knopp v. GuttermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1965
- In Re Estate of RaynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Twin Ports Convalescent, Inc. v. Minnesota State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Minnesota Microwave, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Waller v. Powers Department StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Special School District No. 1 v. DunhamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Underhill v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.