Hammond Lumber Co. v. Barth Investment Corp.

This appeal, which is from the judgment-roll, involves some questions of law similar to those decided in Hammond Lumber Co. v. Barth Investment Corp., ante, p. 601 [262 Pac. 29], and as to such questions that case is decisive. Carl Heilman and Anna Heilman were owners of a lot situated in the city of Los Angeles. C. A. Barth and Barth Investment Corporation contracted with said owners to erect upon said lot a flat at the cost of $13,500 to said owners. The action was commenced to foreclose a materialman’s lien and for a personal judgment against said contractors in the sum of $3,000.17.…