Fritz v. Mills
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal upon the judgment-roll from . a judgment enforcing against defendant Laura J. E. Mills a contract to convey land.
The action was brought by Charles Wesley Reed, the vendee under the contract set out in the complaint, but before entry of judgment, the cause of action was assigned by him to Mary A. Fritz, and she was thereupon substituted as plaintiff. Frederick J. Mills is the husband of Laura J. E. Mills, and is made a party defendant for this reason only. He has no other interest in the controversy. Hereafter in this opinion whenever we refer to the defendant we mean the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Stiles v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Erickson v. WiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Fritz v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Arp v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Rice v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Lee v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.