Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Sparks

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1950No. Civ. 17912PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON,

This action is not, as contended by defendants, for the rescission of deeds to real property signed by plaintiffs pursuant to which defendants assert title, but is (1) to quiet title to the property covered by the deeds, (2) to obtain a judgment of declaratory relief declaring that the deeds are null and void, and (3) for an accounting of the income received .by defendants from the property and the expenditures made for its upkeep.

Findings of fact and conclusions of law were made in favor of plaintiffs upon which an interlocutory judgment was entered that the deeds in question are null…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Grimes v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ballard v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. O'NEIL v. SpillaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Sunset Milling & Grain Co. v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Storage Services v. OosterbaanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Devers v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API