Legal Opinion
State v. Babcock
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 5, 2012No. 41123-7-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
¶1 — Donald Babcock appeals his convictions for conspiracy to commit first degree murder, solicitation to commit first degree murder, and felony harassment, arguing that police recordings of his conversations with an undercover agent violated his rights under Washington’s “Privacy Act.” In a statement of additional grounds, Babcock asserts that the State maliciously prosecuted him and violated his right to counsel by questioning him in jail, and that his counsel ineffectively represented him. RAP 10.10. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
FACTS
A. Background
¶2 In 2004, a jury convicted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Patricia Campbell HearstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CaliguriWashington Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holly Thrasher v. Todd ThrasherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State v. KippCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012