Legal Opinion

United States v. Patricia Campbell Hearst

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 2, 1977No. 76-3162, 77-1759PublishedCited by 260 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was tried under a two-count indictment charging her with armed robbery of a San Francisco bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a), (d) and 924(c)(1). The government introduced photographs and testimony descriptive of appellant’s role in the robbery. Appellant raised the defense of duress, contending her co-participants compelled her to engage in the criminal activity. The jury found appellant guilty. The district court sentenced her to seven years in prison on one count and two years on the other, the sentences to be served concurrently.

Appellant argues that the trial judge erred…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by260 opinions

  1. United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

255 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API