Legal Opinion

Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police Department

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1992No. 58445-1PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, J.

Facts of Case

This is a civil action seeking damages allegedly caused by constitutional and statutory violations of the right to privacy. Appellant, Alice Kadoranian, claims her right to privacy was violated when Bellingham police officers inadvertently intercepted and recorded her brief response to a police informant's telephone inquiry asking whether her father was at home.

Ms. Kadoranian is a 15-year-old Canadian citizen and resident. The telephone interception and recording which she claims violated her right to privacy was inadvertent. It occurred in May 1990. This was after her father,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. FjermestadWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In the Matter of Personal Restraint of PowellWashington Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API