State v. Kipp
Court of Appeals of Washington
1DissentVan Deren, J.
¶63 (dissenting) — Washington State’s privacy act, chapter 9.73 RCW, “is considered one of the most restrictive in the nation.” State v. Townsend, 147 Wn.2d 666, 672, 57 P.3d 255 (2002). Here, the trial court concluded and the majority holds that Kipp’s conversation with Joseph T. was not “private” within the act’s meaning. But our Supreme Court has held that the term “private” within the act means “ ‘belonging to one’s self... secret... intended only for the persons involved ([in] a conversation) ... holding a confidential relationship to something... a secret message: a private…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.