Legal Opinion

F. T. Griswold Mfg. Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 12, 1956No. C. D. 1749PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise under protest consists of a metal article invoiced as an “inscriber” (plaintiff’s exhibit 1), which was imported with a certain optical testing instrument known as a “straightedge” (plaintiff’s exhibit 2), together with all the necessary equipment therefor. The “straightedge” instrument is used for testing the flatness of surfaces, in which connection the inscriber, when employed with it, is mounted upon and attached to the instru*28ment and serves to give a permanent recording on graph paper of the measurements being made by the straightedge to which it is attached.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schweitzer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Welte v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  5. United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Liebert v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Victoria Distributors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Victoria Distributors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Acrow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Enlite Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API