Legal Opinion

Acrow, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 25, 1957No. 61375; protests 282063-K and 271086-K (Los Angeles)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

The two protests herein involved, which have been consolidated for the purposes of trial, challenge the action of the collector of customs at the port of Los Angeles in classifying certain bracing plates or clips within paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, as articles not specially provided for, composed of steel, not plated, and in assessing duty thereon at the rate of 2234 per centum ad valorem.

It is claimed in said protests that the articles in question are parts of machines, not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schweitzer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Acrow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  4. F. T. Griswold Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  5. United American Bosch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API