Legal Opinion

Victoria Distributors, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 9, 1968No. C.D. 3635PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise covered by the protests presently before the court, which have been severed from the protests originally consolidated for trial, consists of “Vindec” generators or “Vindec” generator sets imported from Japan and entered at the port of Philadelphia. The merchandise was assessed with duty at 30 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 371 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, as parts of bicycles. While various claims were made in the protests, the ones now relied upon are that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wedemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  2. F. T. Griswold Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Victoria Distributors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Victoria Distributors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Enlite Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API