Legal Opinion

Liebert v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 12, 1969No. C.D. 3919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case, imported from Canada and entered at the port of Blaine, Washington, is described as back up roll assemblies. It was assessed with duty at 14 per centum ad valorem under item 614.53 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as parts of machine tools, and is claimed to be dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under item 674.55, as an accessory machine used with machine tools.

The pertinent provisions of said tariff schedules are as follows:

Work and tool holders and other parts of, and accessories used principally with, machine tools; * *…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schweitzer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. LiebertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API