Legal Opinion

Employers Casualty Co. v. Ragley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1946No. 2696PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIREY, Justice.

Plaintiff brought this suit to recover fire-loss to a garage and fence which she alleged was covered by the provisions of the; policy issued to her by appellant. The court (non-jury) found that the plaintiff was entitled to recover the sum of $319.57, with legal interest, and entered judgment accordingly, and the defendant has appealed.

Appellant’s first point is: “The court ■erred in allowing'plaintiff to recover under the policy for damage to the garage.” We ■overrule this contention.

The pertinent parts of the policy are:

'“Section I.

'“Building — -Insurance on a building shall…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Traders & General Insurance v. Hicks Rubber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. WestmorelandTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Delta County Farmers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Firemen's Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Goodwin v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colorado Interstate Corporation Colorado Interstate Gas Company v. The Cit Group/equipment Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. Enosburg Falls v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
  3. Coffey v. Girard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Bergstrom Paper Co. v. Continental Ins. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1948
  5. Bergstrom Paper Co. v. Continental Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API