Employers Casualty Co. v. Ragley
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
TIREY, Justice.
Plaintiff brought this suit to recover fire-loss to a garage and fence which she alleged was covered by the provisions of the; policy issued to her by appellant. The court (non-jury) found that the plaintiff was entitled to recover the sum of $319.57, with legal interest, and entered judgment accordingly, and the defendant has appealed.
Appellant’s first point is: “The court ■erred in allowing'plaintiff to recover under the policy for damage to the garage.” We ■overrule this contention.
The pertinent parts of the policy are:
'“Section I.
'“Building — -Insurance on a building shall…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Traders & General Insurance v. Hicks Rubber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. WestmorelandTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Delta County Farmers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Firemen's Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Goodwin v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Colorado Interstate Corporation Colorado Interstate Gas Company v. The Cit Group/equipment Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Enosburg Falls v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
- Coffey v. Girard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Bergstrom Paper Co. v. Continental Ins. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1948
- Bergstrom Paper Co. v. Continental Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.