Legal Opinion
Traders & General Insurance v. Hicks Rubber Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1943No. 8017PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Critz
There are three parties to this suit, Hicks Rubber Company, Employers Casualty Company, and Traders & General Insurance Company, all private corporations. For convenience we will hereinafter refer to such respective parties as Hicks, Employers, and Traders.
This litigation grew out of a former suit by J. W. Harper against Hicks. Hicks was engaged in the tire business at certain premises in the City of Waco> Texas. As a part of such business it operated a number of trucks. These trucks were used by Hicks in transporting its tires. On one occasion one of Hicks’ truck drivers was unloading tires…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Globe National Fire Insurance v. American Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Hicks Rubber Co. v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Hicks Rubber Co., Dist. v. HarperTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Delta County Farmers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Southern Nat. Ins. Co. of Austin v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Mid-Continent Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Employers Casualty Co. v. Transport Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1969
- Trinity Universal Insurance v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. American Employers Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.