Legal Opinion

Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Firemen's Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 6, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The facts were agreed to and the case was submitted on a statement thereof. On December 7th, 1926, The Bradley & Hubbard Manufacturing Company carried insurance amounting to $900,000 against loss, by fire, lightning, sprinkler leakage, or windstorm, upon its manufacturing property, in Meriden, and contents consisting of fixed and movable machinery, apparatus, etc. The contents so insured included, as within the above general description, an electric generator known as Allis-Chalmers Engine Type, Stator S. W. 100112. Of the $900,000 insurance so carried, $90,000 was covered by a policy in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Peters v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Wilson Company v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  3. Grollimund v. Germania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  4. Miller v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Fairchild v. Liverpool & London Fire & Life InsuranceCommission of Appeals · 1872

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cement, Sand & Gravel Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Gottesman v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Texas City Terminal Railway Co. v. American Equitable Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1955
  4. Castoldi v. Hartford County Mutual Fire InsuranceConnecticut Superior Court · 1959
  5. Employers Casualty Co. v. RagleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API