Farr & Stone Insurance Brokers, Inc. v. Lopez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLEMING, J.
Defendant Gus Lopez appeals the judgment for $5,899 plus interest and costs in favor of plaintiff Farr & Stone Insurance Brokers, Inc. in an action for insurance premiums. The trial court heard the cause without a jury and found that Lopez promised to pay past-due insurance premiums owed by Apex Auto Products Company to Farr & Stone and that his promise was an original obligation supported by valid consideration. Lopez contends the evidence shows no promise to pay the premiums, and, if there was a promise, it lacked consideration.
The evidence, which must be viewed in a light…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Michael Distributing Co. v. TobinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Protopappas v. ProtopappasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3Cited by7 opinions
- Graybar Electric Co. v. SawyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Merdes v. UnderwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Maresh Sheet Metal Works v. N. R. G., Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Al Booth's, Inc. v. Boyd-Scarp Enterprises Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Imperial Insurance v. California Casualty Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.