Legal Opinion

Farr & Stone Insurance Brokers, Inc. v. Lopez

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1976No. Civ. 48211PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLEMING, J.

Defendant Gus Lopez appeals the judgment for $5,899 plus interest and costs in favor of plaintiff Farr & Stone Insurance Brokers, Inc. in an action for insurance premiums. The trial court heard the cause without a jury and found that Lopez promised to pay past-due insurance premiums owed by Apex Auto Products Company to Farr & Stone and that his promise was an original obligation supported by valid consideration. Lopez contends the evidence shows no promise to pay the premiums, and, if there was a promise, it lacked consideration.

The evidence, which must be viewed in a light…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Michael Distributing Co. v. TobinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Protopappas v. ProtopappasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Graybar Electric Co. v. SawyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. Merdes v. UnderwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Maresh Sheet Metal Works v. N. R. G., Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. Al Booth's, Inc. v. Boyd-Scarp Enterprises Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Imperial Insurance v. California Casualty Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API