Legal Opinion

Michael Distributing Co. v. Tobin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1964No. Civ. 10719PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, J. pro tem. *

The instant litigation arose out of the attempt by plaintiff, Michael Distributing Company, Inc., doing business as Economy Lumber Company, to collect for lumber supplied in the building of a number of units in a housing project known as “Southgate Units No. 1 and 2.” Judgment was entered in its favor for $11,704.20 and against defendant, Herbert D. Tobin, appellant herein.

Error is predicated upon: (1) the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to show an actionable promise by appellant Tobin as a personal obligation to pay for the lumber; (2) the finding by the trial…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Lockheed Propulsion Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Inland-Ryerson Construction Products Co. v. Brazier Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Farr & Stone Insurance Brokers, Inc. v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API