Legal Opinion
Schumm v. Berg
California Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 1951No. L. A. 21830PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after defendants’ demurrer was sustained without leave to amend in an action against a father’s estate on a contract for the support and education of an illegitimate child.
Plaintiff, Johan Richard Wallace Schumm, is a minor born on February 7,1948; he prosecutes the action by his guardian ad litem, Kay Whyner. Defendants are the executors of the estate of Wallace Beery, deceased. According to the complaint, the following facts appear: Plaintiff is the son of Beery and Gloria Schumm, neither of whom was married. He was conceived as the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Murnick v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Wolford v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- KALPLAN v. KaplanIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Odorizzi v. Bloomfield School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Guardianship of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.