Legal Opinion

Merdes v. Underwood

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1987No. S-1698, S-1717PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted to Richard V. Underwood against Edward A. Merdes based on an alleged agreement by Merdes to pay a debt owed by OHM, Inc. (OHM) to the Alaska Feed Company, an enterprise solely owned by Underwood. The principal issue is whether, as a matter of law, Merdes’ actions and representations estop him from denying that he agreed to pay interest on the debt in question.

I. BACKGROUND.

In about 1970, Merdes and his wife Norma, with Jim and Linda Harding, formed OHM, a subchapter S corporation, to operate a farming business…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. PhillipsAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Carlson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Nizinski v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'n, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Parker v. Northern Mixing Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tore, Ltd. v. ChurchNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Barber v. National Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Walt v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Bibo v. Jeffrey's RestaurantAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API