Legal Opinion

Swan v. Mitshkun

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1919No. Docket No. 5PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Tucker, J., presiding. Bill by Edward P. Swan and others against Mark Mitshkun and another to enjoin the violation of certain building restrictions. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiffs’ bill of complaint was filed in this case to restrain defendants from building a garage for business purposes fronting on Hamilton boulevard upon lots 814, 815, and 816, located at the northeast comer of Puritan avenue and Hamilton boulevard in the Medbury Park subdivision of a part of fractional sections 13 and 14, town 1 south, of range 11 east, in the village of Highland Park, in violation of the following restrictions contained in their muniments of title to said property:

“And in further consideration, that there shall not be erected on the front of said premises^ above…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Misch v. LehmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Moore v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Casterton v. PlotkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Windemere-Grand Improvement & Protective Ass'n v. American State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bethea v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. McQuade v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. O’connor v. Resort Custom Builders, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. GoodloveMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Continental Oil Co. v. FennemoreArizona Supreme Court · 1931

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API