Legal Opinion

McQuade v. Wilcox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1921No. Docket No. 34PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from Oakland; Covert (Frank L.), J. Bill by George J. McQuade and others against Mary M. Wilcox and the Shelbourne Company to enjoin the violation of certain building restrictions. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

In 1910 defendant Mary Millington Wilcox was the owner of 105 acres of farm land lying along Woodward avenue at the 10-mile road. It was over in Oakland county and near Royal Oak. She and her husband, an attorney then practicing in Detroit, conceived the idea of platting a. portion of it for a high class residential subdivision. The plat was prepared and recorded. Its residential and restricted character was made the subject of advertisement and pointed out in conversation as an inducement to- prospective purchasers. A general plan was adopted to make it a high class restricted residential…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Lowes v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  4. Swan v. MitshkunMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. King v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Kirchen v. RemengaMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. GoodloveMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. McLean v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API