Misch v. Lehman
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Mandell, J. Bill by Otto Misch and others against Fred A. Lehman and others for an injunction to enforce a restrictive covenant in certain conveyances. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
The bill of complaint in this cause is filed for the purpose of permanently enjoining defendants from violating a building restriction contained in the conveyance under which they hold title. From a decree in favor of complainants, defendants appeal.
The restriction involved is the same as that considered in the case of Schadt v. Brill, 173 Mich. 647 (139 N. W. 878) ; defendants’ lot being one of the 77 lots contained in the Whitney subdivision. Of these 77 lots, 21 face the East Grand boulevard, lying upon the west side thereof, comihencing at Mack avenue and running south. Defendants’…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Landell v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- McQuade v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Swan v. MitshkunMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Putnam v. ErnstMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Carey v. LauhoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.